<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PA Pundit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://papundit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Pennsylvania Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Teacher Unions &#8212; Souderton Edition by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/the-audacity-of-teacher-unions-souderton-edition/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Not sick yet?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.championnews.net/article.php?sid=2242&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s an analysis of an astonishing teacher&#039;s contract in one Illinois school district&lt;/a&gt;.  Sadly, this is not an exception....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sick yet?  <a href="http://www.championnews.net/article.php?sid=2242" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s an analysis of an astonishing teacher&#8217;s contract in one Illinois school district</a>.  Sadly, this is not an exception&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Teacher Unions by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/the-audacity-of-teacher-unions/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=157#comment-307</guid>
		<description>So in contrast to your union do you approve of merit pay to reward the teachers like you who do more than their contract requires?  If so what have you done about it?  Because your union ensures that you are only rewarded for holding on to your job for as long as possible ... and as you admit, the job can burn you out, so your highest-paid colleagues are likely the senior ones doing the bare minimum to hold out for a full pension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in contrast to your union do you approve of merit pay to reward the teachers like you who do more than their contract requires?  If so what have you done about it?  Because your union ensures that you are only rewarded for holding on to your job for as long as possible &#8230; and as you admit, the job can burn you out, so your highest-paid colleagues are likely the senior ones doing the bare minimum to hold out for a full pension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Teacher Unions by anonymousteacher</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/the-audacity-of-teacher-unions/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymousteacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=157#comment-306</guid>
		<description>You clearly do not have experience working in today&#039;s classroom.  It can burn you out.  The amount of energy, emotion, time and money that can go into creating positive classrooms and great learning opportunites for students cannot be fathomed by someone who has not spent extended time in a classroom - as a teacher.  While you may have experience with teachers that only work 35 hours, 9 months a year, I don&#039;t know a single one out of the 70 in my building that does so.  The contract hours are only face time in the school and DO NOT reflect how much time after regular school hours, outside of school, on weekends, over the summer that is dedicated to the job.  I&#039;m not going to hold my breath, but it would be really refreshing if you would open your eyes and your mind.  Why don&#039;t you just ask some teachers how much time they spend working on school related activities (like grading, planning, professional development, buying classroom materials- most likely with their own money) outside of contract hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You clearly do not have experience working in today&#8217;s classroom.  It can burn you out.  The amount of energy, emotion, time and money that can go into creating positive classrooms and great learning opportunites for students cannot be fathomed by someone who has not spent extended time in a classroom &#8211; as a teacher.  While you may have experience with teachers that only work 35 hours, 9 months a year, I don&#8217;t know a single one out of the 70 in my building that does so.  The contract hours are only face time in the school and DO NOT reflect how much time after regular school hours, outside of school, on weekends, over the summer that is dedicated to the job.  I&#8217;m not going to hold my breath, but it would be really refreshing if you would open your eyes and your mind.  Why don&#8217;t you just ask some teachers how much time they spend working on school related activities (like grading, planning, professional development, buying classroom materials- most likely with their own money) outside of contract hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PA Income Tax Law: Heads They Win, Tails You Lose by Dave</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/pa-income-tax-law-heads-they-win-tails-you-lose/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-304</guid>
		<description>I agree, this PA tax law is just wrong, what is the matter with our politicians?  Can&#039;t they fix this to make it fair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this PA tax law is just wrong, what is the matter with our politicians?  Can&#8217;t they fix this to make it fair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by Harry James</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-303</guid>
		<description>&quot;Will States Restrain the Federal Government?

I do not think so.

It appears to me that the states exist in name only and presently function as territories under the jurisdiction of the federal government.  As such they are no longer (since post civil war reconstruction and the adoption of the 14th Amendment) free and independent states.  Since there is no lawful money in circulation they also are bankrupt.

Remember, at the close of the War of Independence the sovereignty devolved upon the &quot;people&quot; not the governments of the individual colonies.  Where are the sovereign people today?  

After the Civil War the former Union was &quot;reconstructed.&quot;  

In order for any thing to be &quot;re-constructed it must have first been deconstructed or dismantled in some way.

The Union clearly was not reconstructed in the same republican form of government as it was first constructed.  If this be a correct observation then those who are today claiming state&#039;s rights are riding a dead horse.

In the above list of 20 things that Congress is permitted to do, you might add one thing they are also required to do and that is they must guarantee to every state a republican form of government.  

Do we have such a republican form of government in Pennsylvania today or is it a majority rule democracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Will States Restrain the Federal Government?</p>
<p>I do not think so.</p>
<p>It appears to me that the states exist in name only and presently function as territories under the jurisdiction of the federal government.  As such they are no longer (since post civil war reconstruction and the adoption of the 14th Amendment) free and independent states.  Since there is no lawful money in circulation they also are bankrupt.</p>
<p>Remember, at the close of the War of Independence the sovereignty devolved upon the &#8220;people&#8221; not the governments of the individual colonies.  Where are the sovereign people today?  </p>
<p>After the Civil War the former Union was &#8220;reconstructed.&#8221;  </p>
<p>In order for any thing to be &#8220;re-constructed it must have first been deconstructed or dismantled in some way.</p>
<p>The Union clearly was not reconstructed in the same republican form of government as it was first constructed.  If this be a correct observation then those who are today claiming state&#8217;s rights are riding a dead horse.</p>
<p>In the above list of 20 things that Congress is permitted to do, you might add one thing they are also required to do and that is they must guarantee to every state a republican form of government.  </p>
<p>Do we have such a republican form of government in Pennsylvania today or is it a majority rule democracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Teacher Unions by federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/the-audacity-of-teacher-unions/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=157#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Did you know that public school teachers still get &quot;sabbaticals?&quot;  Apparently working 35-hour weeks 9 months a year can burn you out, so every seven years teachers can take a break and still receive 50% of their pay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that public school teachers still get &#8220;sabbaticals?&#8221;  Apparently working 35-hour weeks 9 months a year can burn you out, so every seven years teachers can take a break and still receive 50% of their pay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government Employees Live in a Different World by federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/government-employees-live-in-a-different-world/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Noted in Steve Malanga&#039;s essay, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124227027965718333.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unions vs. Taxpayers&lt;/a&gt;:&quot;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
A study in 2005 by the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute estimated that the average public-sector worker earned 46% more in salary and benefits than comparable private-sector workers. The gap has only continued to grow. For example, state and local worker pay and benefits rose 3.1% in the last year, compared to 1.9% in the private sector, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

But the real power of the public sector is showing through in this economic crisis. Some five million private-sector workers have lost their jobs in the last year alone, and their unemployment rate is above 9% according to the BLS. By contrast, public-sector employment has grown in virtually every month of the recession, and the jobless rate for government workers is a mere 2.8%. For anyone who thinks such low unemployment numbers are good news, remember that the bulging public sector must be paid for with revenues that most governments don&#039;t currently have.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted in Steve Malanga&#8217;s essay, &#8220;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124227027965718333.html" rel="nofollow">Unions vs. Taxpayers</a>:&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>
A study in 2005 by the nonpartisan Employee Benefit Research Institute estimated that the average public-sector worker earned 46% more in salary and benefits than comparable private-sector workers. The gap has only continued to grow. For example, state and local worker pay and benefits rose 3.1% in the last year, compared to 1.9% in the private sector, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).</p>
<p>But the real power of the public sector is showing through in this economic crisis. Some five million private-sector workers have lost their jobs in the last year alone, and their unemployment rate is above 9% according to the BLS. By contrast, public-sector employment has grown in virtually every month of the recession, and the jobless rate for government workers is a mere 2.8%. For anyone who thinks such low unemployment numbers are good news, remember that the bulging public sector must be paid for with revenues that most governments don&#8217;t currently have.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Audacity of Teacher Unions &#8212; Souderton Edition by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/the-audacity-of-teacher-unions-souderton-edition/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-295</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://schoolboardtransparency.org/2009/04/28/souderton-sd-reaches-contract-agreement/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;School Board Transparency blog covers the conclusion&lt;/a&gt; of this contract &quot;negotiation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://schoolboardtransparency.org/2009/04/28/souderton-sd-reaches-contract-agreement/" rel="nofollow">School Board Transparency blog covers the conclusion</a> of this contract &#8220;negotiation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Strike-Free Education Act by federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/strike-free-education-act/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/01/21/strike-free-education-act/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/24430/To_Cut_Waste_Ban_Teachers_Strikes.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Another excellent essay against teacher strikes&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.championnews.net/pension.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bill Zettler&lt;/a&gt; of Illinois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/24430/To_Cut_Waste_Ban_Teachers_Strikes.html" rel="nofollow">Another excellent essay against teacher strikes</a> by <a href="http://www.championnews.net/pension.php" rel="nofollow">Bill Zettler</a> of Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Service Can Really Pay by federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/public-service-can-really-pay/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-291</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.championnews.net/article.php?sid=1534&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This report on Illinois noting that 3195 former IL public employees receive &lt;i&gt;annual pensions of over $100k/year&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.championnews.net/article.php?sid=1534" rel="nofollow">This report on Illinois noting that 3195 former IL public employees receive <i>annual pensions of over $100k/year</i></a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Service Can Really Pay by federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/04/07/public-service-can-really-pay/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=175#comment-290</guid>
		<description>USA Today reports &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2009-04-09-compensation_N.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Benefits widen public, private workers&#039; pay gap&lt;/a&gt;&quot;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Public employees earned benefits worth an average of $13.38 an hour in December 2008, the latest available data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) says. Private-sector workers got $7.98 an hour.

Overall, total compensation for state and local workers was $39.25 an hour — $11.90 more than in private business. In 2007, the gap in wages and benefits was $11.31.

The gap has been expanding because of the increasing value of public employee benefits. Last year, government benefits rose three times more than those in the private sector: up 69 cents an hour for civil servants, 23 cents for private workers.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USA Today reports &#8220;<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2009-04-09-compensation_N.htm" rel="nofollow">Benefits widen public, private workers&#8217; pay gap</a>&#8220;:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Public employees earned benefits worth an average of $13.38 an hour in December 2008, the latest available data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) says. Private-sector workers got $7.98 an hour.</p>
<p>Overall, total compensation for state and local workers was $39.25 an hour — $11.90 more than in private business. In 2007, the gap in wages and benefits was $11.31.</p>
<p>The gap has been expanding because of the increasing value of public employee benefits. Last year, government benefits rose three times more than those in the private sector: up 69 cents an hour for civil servants, 23 cents for private workers.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Public Union Contracts Should Be Negotiated In Public by Fred D. Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/why-public-union-contracts-should-be-negotiated-in-public/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred D. Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=173#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post.  For a short list of how public sector bargaining, especially for schools, differs from private sector bargaining, see a Sunshine Review note at http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Collective_bargaining%2Cprivate-public_sector_differences.  Here are three important differences:
  -- A manufacturer can close a plant, but a school board can&#039;t move classes to a nearby district with lower labor costs, much less to Mexico or Taiwan.
  -- School directors are elected officials, and teachers naturally vote for candidates they expect to support their goals.   During negotiations, union agendas may have advocates on both sides of the table.
  -- If Coke workers strike, customers can switch to Pepsi.  If transit workers strike, many riders can car pool.  When schools are closed on short notice, parents can’t easily find substitute suppliers.
 In general, economic issues drive private-sector bargaining.  Public-sector bargaining is inherently political.  Union demands to school boards should be understood as a form of lobbying, not as bargaining between two parties about how to share expected sales revenue.  Lobbying is a free-speech right meriting legal protection.  But I think the public is entitled to know what lobbyists are asking from public officials.  And I’m absolutely convinced that public officials should disclose how they propose to respond to what lobbyists are asking for -- and not just after deals have been struck.
    Fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post.  For a short list of how public sector bargaining, especially for schools, differs from private sector bargaining, see a Sunshine Review note at <a href="http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Collective_bargaining%2Cprivate-public_sector_differences" rel="nofollow">http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Collective_bargaining%2Cprivate-public_sector_differences</a>.  Here are three important differences:<br />
  &#8212; A manufacturer can close a plant, but a school board can&#8217;t move classes to a nearby district with lower labor costs, much less to Mexico or Taiwan.<br />
  &#8212; School directors are elected officials, and teachers naturally vote for candidates they expect to support their goals.   During negotiations, union agendas may have advocates on both sides of the table.<br />
  &#8212; If Coke workers strike, customers can switch to Pepsi.  If transit workers strike, many riders can car pool.  When schools are closed on short notice, parents can’t easily find substitute suppliers.<br />
 In general, economic issues drive private-sector bargaining.  Public-sector bargaining is inherently political.  Union demands to school boards should be understood as a form of lobbying, not as bargaining between two parties about how to share expected sales revenue.  Lobbying is a free-speech right meriting legal protection.  But I think the public is entitled to know what lobbyists are asking from public officials.  And I’m absolutely convinced that public officials should disclose how they propose to respond to what lobbyists are asking for &#8212; and not just after deals have been struck.<br />
    Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by Will States Restrain the Federal Government? &#124; Federalist</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Will States Restrain the Federal Government? &#124; Federalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...]   Mark Sanford, Governor of South Carolina, is asserting that point, and suggesting that his state should not take any of this money. The Pennsylvania state legislature is also considering a resolution that would “put the federal government on notice,” and serve as a preamble to repealing all extra-constitutional federal laws and taxes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Mark Sanford, Governor of South Carolina, is asserting that point, and suggesting that his state should not take any of this money. The Pennsylvania state legislature is also considering a resolution that would “put the federal government on notice,” and serve as a preamble to repealing all extra-constitutional federal laws and taxes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-287</guid>
		<description>According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DownsizeDC.org&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
[T]here are only 20 things the Congress is permitted to do under the Constitution. Here&#039;s the list:
1. Borrow money.
2. Regulate commerce among states. 
3. Regulate naturalization.
4. Regulate bankruptcies. 
5. Coin money.
6. Fix weights and measures. 
7. Punish counterfeiters.
8. Establish post offices. 
9. Establish post roads.
10. Record patents. 
11. Protect copyrights.
12. Create federal courts. 
13. Punish pirates.
14. Declare war. 
15. Raise an army.
16. Provide a navy. 
17. Call up the militia.
18. Organize the militia. 
19. Make laws for Washington, DC.
20. Make rules for the Army and Navy. 

If the issue before Congress is not on the list, they shouldn&#039;t be legislating on it. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments reserve all other powers to the various states and to individuals.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/" rel="nofollow">DownsizeDC.org</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
[T]here are only 20 things the Congress is permitted to do under the Constitution. Here&#8217;s the list:<br />
1. Borrow money.<br />
2. Regulate commerce among states.<br />
3. Regulate naturalization.<br />
4. Regulate bankruptcies.<br />
5. Coin money.<br />
6. Fix weights and measures.<br />
7. Punish counterfeiters.<br />
8. Establish post offices.<br />
9. Establish post roads.<br />
10. Record patents.<br />
11. Protect copyrights.<br />
12. Create federal courts.<br />
13. Punish pirates.<br />
14. Declare war.<br />
15. Raise an army.<br />
16. Provide a navy.<br />
17. Call up the militia.<br />
18. Organize the militia.<br />
19. Make laws for Washington, DC.<br />
20. Make rules for the Army and Navy. </p>
<p>If the issue before Congress is not on the list, they shouldn&#8217;t be legislating on it. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments reserve all other powers to the various states and to individuals.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by Patrick Sperry</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Twenty and counting... PA in a revolt..? Say it isn&#039;t so. I mean, it&#039;s not a southern state, or even one of those square sided fly over places on the frontier...

Ok, ok, just kidding :)

Just remember these issues the next time, and every time that your politicians side with  Chuck Schumer or Lautenberg or any of the rest of the gang!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty and counting&#8230; PA in a revolt..? Say it isn&#8217;t so. I mean, it&#8217;s not a southern state, or even one of those square sided fly over places on the frontier&#8230;</p>
<p>Ok, ok, just kidding <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just remember these issues the next time, and every time that your politicians side with  Chuck Schumer or Lautenberg or any of the rest of the gang!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by The 10th Amendment &#124; PAWaterCooler.com</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>The 10th Amendment &#124; PAWaterCooler.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-285</guid>
		<description>[...] State Rep Sam Rohrer does. State Representative Sam Rohrer is circulating an excellent resolution putting the federal government on notice that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will no longer tolerate infringement of its sovereignty, and calling on the federal government to respect the U.S. Constitution’s plain restraint on its power. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] State Rep Sam Rohrer does. State Representative Sam Rohrer is circulating an excellent resolution putting the federal government on notice that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania will no longer tolerate infringement of its sovereignty, and calling on the federal government to respect the U.S. Constitution’s plain restraint on its power. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Pennsylvania Assert its Sovereign Rights? by Lysander</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/will-pennsylvania-assert-its-sovereign-rights/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Lysander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=168#comment-284</guid>
		<description>This should be a no-brainer.  After all, it is the obligation of everyone who has sworn allegiance to the U.S. Constitution to ensure that it is respected by government at all levels.

The &lt;a href=&quot;http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Constitution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PA Constitution&lt;/a&gt; (Article 6 Section 3) requires our legislators to take the following oath prior to taking office:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be a no-brainer.  After all, it is the obligation of everyone who has sworn allegiance to the U.S. Constitution to ensure that it is respected by government at all levels.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://sites.state.pa.us/PA_Constitution.html" rel="nofollow">PA Constitution</a> (Article 6 Section 3) requires our legislators to take the following oath prior to taking office:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidelity.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government Employees Live in a Different World by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/government-employees-live-in-a-different-world/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-283</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0216/078.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Forbes&lt;/a&gt;, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/68946/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Instapundit&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
In public-sector America things just get better and better. The common presumption is that public servants forgo high wages in exchange for safe jobs and benefits. The reality is they get all three.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/0216/078.html" rel="nofollow">Forbes</a>, via <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/68946/" rel="nofollow">Instapundit</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
In public-sector America things just get better and better. The common presumption is that public servants forgo high wages in exchange for safe jobs and benefits. The reality is they get all three.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Pension Prejudice by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/public-pension-prejudice/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leader-vindicator.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20250223&amp;BRD=2758&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=572980&amp;rfi=6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an editorial in support of Senator Browne&#039;s legislation&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.leader-vindicator.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20250223&amp;BRD=2758&amp;PAG=461&amp;dept_id=572980&amp;rfi=6" rel="nofollow">an editorial in support of Senator Browne&#8217;s legislation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Pension Prejudice by papundit</title>
		<link>http://papundit.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/public-pension-prejudice/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>papundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papundit.wordpress.com/?p=159#comment-280</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pasenategop.com/news/archived/2007/1107/browne-110507.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Senator Pat Browne&lt;/a&gt; et. al. introduced the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/newsreleases/public-pension-reform-introduced&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unified Contribution Pension Plan&lt;/a&gt;&quot; to finally shift Pennsylvania public employees to a defined-contribution pension system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pasenategop.com/news/archived/2007/1107/browne-110507.htm" rel="nofollow">Senator Pat Browne</a> et. al. introduced the &#8220;<a href="http://www.commonwealthfoundation.org/newsreleases/public-pension-reform-introduced" rel="nofollow">Unified Contribution Pension Plan</a>&#8221; to finally shift Pennsylvania public employees to a defined-contribution pension system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
